Journal / Book Title
Public Administration Review
University ranking has high public visibility, the ranking business has flourished, and institutions of higher education have not been able to ignore it. This study of university ranking presents general considerations of ranking and institutional responses to it, particularly considering reactions to ranking, ranking as a self-fulfilling prophecy, and ranking as a means of transforming qualities into quantities. The authors present a conceptual framework of university ranking based on three propositions and carry out a descriptive statistical analysis of U.S. and international ranking data to evaluate those propositions. The first proposition of university ranking is that ranking systems are demarcated by a high degree of stability, equilibrium, and path dependence. The second proposition links ranking to institutional identity. The third proposition posits that rankings function as a catalyst for institutional isomorphism. The conclusion reviews some important new developments in university ranking.
MSU Digital Commons Citation
Koppell, Jonathan G.S.; Fowles, Jacob; and Frederickson, H. George, "University Rankings: Evidence and a Conceptual Framework" (2016). Publications from President Jonathan G.S. Koppell. 8.
Fowles, Jacob, H. George Frederickson, and Jonathan GS Koppell. "University rankings: Evidence and a conceptual framework." Public Administration Review 76, no. 5 (2016): 790-803. Harvard
Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Economic History Commons, Economic Theory Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Education Economics Commons, Growth and Development Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Macroeconomics Commons, Other Economics Commons, Public Economics Commons, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Commons, Secondary Education Commons, Special Education and Teaching Commons