Journal / Book Title
Psychology in the Schools
This study evaluated the classification accuracy of a second grade oral reading fluency curriculum-based measure (R-CBM) in predicting third grade state test performance. It also compared the long-term classification accuracy of local and publisher-recommended R-CBM cut scores. Participants were 266 students who were divided into a calibration sample (n = 170) and two cross-validation samples (n = 46; n = 50), respectively. Using calibration sample data, local fall, winter, and spring R-CBM cut scores for predicting students’ state test performance were developed using three methods: discriminant analysis (DA), logistic regression (LR), and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC). The classification accuracy of local and publisher-recommended cut scores was evaluated across subsamples. Only DA and ROC produced cut scores that maintained adequate sensitivity (≥.70) across cohorts; however, LR and publisher-recommended scores had higher levels of specificity and overall correct classification. Implications for developing local cut scores are discussed.
MSU Digital Commons Citation
Grapin, Sally; Kranzler, John H.; Waldron, Nancy; Joyce-Beaulieu, Diana; and Algina, James, "Developing Local Oral Reading Fluency Cut Scores for Predicting High-Stakes Test Performance" (2017). Department of Psychology Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works. 171.
Grapin, S. L., Kranzler, J. H., Waldron, N., Joyce‐Beaulieu, D., & Algina, J. (2017). Developing local oral reading fluency cut scores for predicting high‐stakes test performance. Psychology in the Schools, 54(9), 932-946.