Usefulness of a Human Error Identification Tool for Requirements Inspection: An Experience Report
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
1-1-2017
Abstract
Context and Motivation: Our recent work leverages Cognitive Psychology research on human errors to improve the standard fault-based requirements inspections. Question: The empirical study presented in this paper investigates the effectiveness of a newly developed Human Error Abstraction Assist (HEAA) tool in helping inspectors identify human errors to guide the fault detection during the requirements inspection. Results: The results showed that the HEAA tool, though effective, presented challenges during the error abstraction process. Contribution: In this experience report, we present major challenges during the study execution and lessons learned for future replications.
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-54045-0_26
Montclair State University Digital Commons Citation
Anu, Vaibhav; Walia, Gursimran; Bradshaw, Gary; Hu, Wenhua; and Carver, Jeffrey C., "Usefulness of a Human Error Identification Tool for Requirements Inspection: An Experience Report" (2017). Department of Computer Science Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works. 613.
https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/compusci-facpubs/613