Title
The Influence of Divorcing Mothers' Demeanor on Custody Evaluators' Assessment of Their Domestic Violence Allegations
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2015
Abstract
A gap exists between empirical evidence demonstrating the risks posed by domestic violence (DV) and the weight that evidence is given by custody evaluators. This gap may result from common beliefs about DV that diminish or deny its seriousness, which include that mothers often make false allegations to gain advantage and that DV and high conflict are synonymous and do not require differential approaches. Using a multiple segment factorial vignette design, we systematically assessed how these beliefs influenced custody evaluators' (N = 603) recommendations and judgments of the believability of allegations. Mother's demeanor (i.e., hostile vs. pleasant) was the most consistent predictor of evaluators' recommendations and judgments of credibility. Findings have implications for providing research-based education and training for evaluators.
DOI
10.1080/15379418.2014.943451
MSU Digital Commons Citation
Hardesty, Jennifer L.; Hans, Jason D.; Haselschwerdt, Megan L.; Khaw, Lyndal; and Crossman, Kimberly A., "The Influence of Divorcing Mothers' Demeanor on Custody Evaluators' Assessment of Their Domestic Violence Allegations" (2015). Department of Family Science and Human Development Scholarship and Creative Works. 166.
https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/familysci-facpubs/166