Document Type

Article

Publication Date

Spring 4-17-2008

Journal / Book Title

Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

We examined the psychometric properties of the newly created Counterfactual Thinking for Negative Events Scale (CTNES) in two studies involving university undergraduates. In Study 1 (N = 634), factor analysis revealed four subscales that correspond with various types of counterfactual thinking: Nonreferent Downward, Other-Referent Upward, Self-Referent Upward, and Nonreferent Upward. The subscales were largely orthogonal and had adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The CTNES subscales were positively correlated with a traditional method of assessing counterfactual thinking and were related as expected to contextual aspects of the negative event, negative affect, and cognitive style. In Study 2 (N = 208), we further examined the validity of the scale and demonstrated that the subscales were sensitive to an experimental manipulation concerning the type of negative event participants recalled. Moreover, the CTNES subscales correlated in the expected direction with measures of coping and cognitive style.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701884996

Published Citation

Rye, Mark S., Melissa B. Cahoon, Rahan S. Ali, and Tarika Daftary. "Development and validation of the counterfactual thinking for negative events scale." Journal of personality assessment 90, no. 3 (2008): 261-269.

Share

COinS