Authors

Christian Mulder, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
Elena M. Bennett, McGill University, Macdonald Campus
David A. Bohan, Laboratoire CNRS Unité de Recherche Agroécologie
Michael Bonkowski, Universität zu Köln
Stephen R. Carpenter, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Rachel Chalmers, Ysbyty Singleton
Wolfgang Cramer, Aix Marseille Université
Isabelle Durance, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences
Nico Eisenhauer, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Colin Fontaine, Sorbonne Université
Alison J. Haughton, Rothamsted Research
Jean Paul Hettelingh, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
Jes Hines, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Sébastien Ibanez, Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Erik Jeppesen, Aarhus Universitet
Jennifer Adams Krumins, Montclair State UniversityFollow
Athen Ma, Queen Mary University of London
Giorgio Mancinelli, Università del Salento
François Massol, Université de Lille
Órla McLaughlin, Laboratoire CNRS Unité de Recherche Agroécologie
Shahid Naeem, Columbia University
Unai Pascual, Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science
Josep Peñuelas, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Nathalie Pettorelli, Zoological Society of London Institute of Zoology
Michael J.O. Pocock, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Dave Raffaelli, University of York
Jes J. Rasmussen, Aarhus Universitet
Graciela M. Rusch, Trondheim hovedkontor
Christoph Scherber, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Heikki Setälä, Helsingin Yliopisto
William J. Sutherland, University of Cambridge
Corinne Vacher, Université de Bordeaux

Document Type

Preprint

Publication Date

1-1-2015

Journal / Book Title

Advances in Ecological Research

Abstract

The study of ecological services (ESs) is fast becoming a cornerstone of mainstream ecology, largely because they provide a useful means of linking functioning to societal benefits in complex systems by connecting different organizational levels. In order to identify the main challenges facing current and future ES research, we analyzed the effects of the publication of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA, 2005) on different disciplines. Within a set of topics framed around concepts embedded within the MEA, each co-author identified five key research challenges and, where feasible, suggested possible solutions. Concepts included those related to specific service types (i.e. provisioning, supporting, regulating, cultural, aesthetic services) as well as more synthetic issues spanning the natural and social sciences, which often linked a wide range of disciplines, as was the case for the application of network theory. By merging similar responses, and removing some of the narrower suggestions from our sample pool, we distilled the key challenges into a smaller subset. We review some of the historical context to the MEA and identify some of the broader scientific and philosophical issues that still permeate discourse in this field. Finally, we consider where the greatest advances are most likely to be made in the next decade and beyond.

DOI

10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.10.005

Rights

This is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Advances in ecological research (Ed. Elsevier). A definitive version was subsequently published in Mulder, C. et al. “10 years later: revisiting priorities for science and society a decade after the millennium ecosystem assessment” in Advances in ecological reserach, vol. 53 (2015), p.1-53.

Included in

Biology Commons

Share

COinS