"Relations Between Causal Attributions for Stuttering and Psychological" by Michael Boyle
 

Relations Between Causal Attributions for Stuttering and Psychological Well-Being in Adults who Stutter

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-2-2016

Abstract

Purpose: This study attempted to understand the relationship between causal attributions for stuttering and psychological well-being in adults who stutter. Method: The study employed a cross-sectional design using a web survey distribution mode to gain information related to causal attributions and psychological well-being of 348 adults who stutter. Correlation analyses were conducted to determine relationships between participants' causal attributions (i.e. locus of causality, external control, personal control, stability, biological attributions, non-biological attributions) for stuttering and various measures of psychological well-being including self-stigma, self-esteem/self-efficacy, hope, anxiety and depression. Result: Results indicated that higher perceptions of external control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy and higher ratings of anxiety and depression. Higher perceptions of personal control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of self-stigma and higher ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy. Increased biological attributions were significantly related to higher ratings of permanency and unchangeableness of stuttering and lower ratings of personal control of stuttering. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the importance of instilling a sense of control in PWS regarding their ability to manage their stuttering. Findings also raise questions regarding the benefits of educating PWS about the biological underpinnings of stuttering.

DOI

10.3109/17549507.2015.1060529

This document is currently not available here.

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 21
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 3
  • Captures
    • Readers: 49
  • Social Media
    • Shares, Likes & Comments: 28
see details

Share

COinS