Is Alignment Always the Result of Automatic Priming?
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-1-2004
Journal / Book Title
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Abstract
Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) mechanistic theory of dialogue attempts to detail the psychological processes involved in communication that are lacking in Clark's theory. By relying on automatic priming and alignment processes, however, the theory falters when it comes to explaining much of dialogic interaction. We argue for the inclusion of less automatic, though not completely conscious and deliberate, processes to explain such phenomena.
DOI
10.1017/S0140525X0436005X
MSU Digital Commons Citation
Krauss, Robert M. and Pardo, Jennifer, "Is Alignment Always the Result of Automatic Priming?" (2004). Department of Psychology Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works. 297.
https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/psychology-facpubs/297
Published Citation
Krauss, R. M., & Pardo, J. S. (2004). Is alignment always the result of automatic priming?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 203-204.