"Reputational concerns, not altruism, motivate restraint when gambling " by Kodi B. Arfer, Michael T. Bixter et al.
 

Reputational concerns, not altruism, motivate restraint when gambling with other people’s money

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2015

Journal / Book Title

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

People may behave prosocially not only because they value the welfare of others, but also to protect their own reputation. We examined the separate roles of altruism and reputational concerns in moral-hazard gambling tasks, which allowed subjects to gamble with a partner’s money. In Study1, subjects who were told that their partner would see their choices were more prosocial. InStudy2, subjects were more prosocial to a single partner when their choices were transparent than when their choices were attributed to a third party. We conclude that reputational concerns are a key restraint on selfish exploitation under moral hazard.

Comments

This article is Open Access and distributed under a Creative Commons 4.0 License.

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00848

This document is currently not available here.

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 8
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 3
  • Captures
    • Readers: 41
see details

Share

COinS